Current:Home > FinanceIndia’s Supreme Court upholds government’s decision to remove disputed Kashmir’s special status -Finovate
India’s Supreme Court upholds government’s decision to remove disputed Kashmir’s special status
View
Date:2025-04-15 16:58:48
SRINAGAR, India (AP) — India’s top court on Monday upheld a 2019 decision by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government to strip disputed Jammu and Kashmir’s special status as a semi-autonomous region with a separate constitution and inherited protections on land and jobs.
The five-judge constitutional bench of the Supreme Court ruled that the region’s special status had been a “temporary provision” and that removing it in 2019 was constitutionally valid.
The unprecedented move also divided the region into two federal territories, Ladakh and Jammu-Kashmir, both ruled directly by the central government without a legislature of their own. As a result, the Muslim-majority region is now run by unelected government officials and has lost its flag, criminal code and constitution.
But Chief Justice Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud said the government has promised to restore Jammu-Kashmir’s statehood and should do so as soon as possible. Ladakh, however, will remain a federal territory.
He also ordered the country’s election commission to hold local legislative polls in the region by next Sept. 30.
The ruling is expected to boost the electoral prospects of Modi’s governing Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party in national polls next year. The 2019 move resonated in much of India, where the Modi government was cheered by supporters for fulfilling a long-held Hindu nationalist pledge to scrap the Muslim-majority region’s special status.
But the judgment will disappoint many in Kashmir, including the region’s main pro-India Kashmiri politicians who had petitioned the Supreme Court to reverse the deeply unpopular decision, which was imposed under an unprecedented security and communication clampdown that lasted many months.
The court’s hearings began in August and included extensive arguments and discussions on the move’s constitutional validity.
veryGood! (7)
Related
- Sam Taylor
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
Ranking
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Recommendation
Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back